More Than 5 Million Users Trust 24 Unpaid Volunteers With Their Operating System

They have no installer, budget, or corporation behind them. By every business metric, they should be dead. They are not.

More Than 5 Million Users Trust 24 Unpaid Volunteers With Their Operating System

One founder. Three leaders. Zero installers.

Canonical employs hundreds of engineers. Red Hat charges thousands per server. Both ship Linux distributions backed by corporate budgets, product managers, and roadmaps.

Twenty-four volunteers maintain Arch Linux for millions of users.

No corporation, installer, or graphical configuration tool.

You get a command line and the assumption that you will read the documentation before you complain.

By every business metric, Arch should have died years ago. It did not. It outlived distributions with ten times the funding, built a Wiki that engineers on every other distribution quietly depend on, and produced a four-word meme that became a generational badge.

The distributions that died treated the user as a customer. The distributions that lasted treated the user as a colleague. Arch took that second bet harder than anyone.

I wrote a lot about Linux for the last two weeks because of Ubuntu 26.04 LTS and Fedora 44 releases. It is time for Arch to give Ubuntu some lessons, because Canonical seems to be planning to treat users as customers.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Already have an account? Sign in.

Subscribe to Can Artuc

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe